As I was reading Romans 11 a verse and concept jumped out at me. Let’s look at what Paul said. Romans 11:16-24
If the first piece of dough is holy, the lump is also; and if the root is holy, the branches are too. 17 But if some of the branches were broken off, and you, being a wild olive, were grafted in among them and became partaker with them of the rich root of the olive tree, 18 do not be arrogant toward the branches; but if you are arrogant, remember that it is not you who supports the root, but the root supports you. You will say then, “Branches were broken off so that I might be grafted in.” 20 Quite right, they were broken off for their unbelief, but you stand by your faith. Do not be conceited, but fear; 21 for if God did not spare the natural branches, He will not spare you, either. 22 Behold then the kindness and severity of God; to those who fell, severity, but to you, God’s kindness, if you continue in His kindness; otherwise you also will be cut off. 23 And they also, if they do not continue in their unbelief, will be grafted in, for God is able to graft them in again. 24 For if you were cut off from what is by nature a wild olive tree, and were grafted contrary to nature into a cultivated olive tree, how much more will these who are the natural branches be grafted into their own olive tree? 25 For I do not want you, brethren, to be uninformed of this mystery—so that you will not be wise in your own estimation—that a partial hardening has happened to Israel until the fullness of the Gentiles has come in; 26 and so all Israel will be saved; just as it is written, “The Deliverer will come from Zion, He will remove ungodliness from Jacob.” 27 “This is My covenant with them, When I take away their sins.”
This is in the context of explaining the fact that the Jews had not been faithful to their promises and commitments. They had not followed the Lord, and consequently, God had stopped working with them. Paul, in chapter 9 mourned this and prayed fervently for the Jews to get back into relationship with the Lord, their God. He went on to explain that Israel had been set aside and God is now working with the Church to “preach the Gospel to all the world.” (Mark 16:15)
Our context for this consideration is Daniel 9:24-27. Let’s check that.
“Seventy weeks have been decreed for your people and your holy city, to finish the transgression, to make an end of sin, to make atonement for iniquity, to bring in everlasting righteousness, to seal up vision and prophecy and to anoint the most holy place. 25 So you are to know and discern that from the issuing of a decree to restore and rebuild Jerusalem until Messiah the Prince there will be seven weeks and sixty-two weeks; it will be built again, with plaza and moat, even in times of distress. 26 Then after the sixty-two weeks the Messiah will be cut off and have nothing, and the people of the prince who is to come will destroy the city and the sanctuary. And its end will come with a flood; even to the end there will be war; desolations are determined. 27 And he will make a firm covenant with the many for one week, but in the middle of the week he will put a stop to sacrifice and grain offering; and on the wing of abominations will come one who makes desolate, even until a complete destruction, one that is decreed, is poured out on the one who makes desolate.”
Daniel had read the fact that the Nation of Israel would be captive in Babylon for 70 years in Jeremiah 25:11, 12 and Jeremiah 29:10. So his prayer was, “What next?” The passage in Daniel is God’s answer to Daniel. There will be 490 years in Israel’s history. The first 483 years led up to the Messiah, when He would be cut off. We read about that in the Gospels when Jesus was rejected as Messiah on Palm Sunday then crucified later that week. (Roughly AD 29-33)
Following that event, Jerusalem would be destroyed. This happened in AD 70. The rest of the verse tells about a “prince who is to come,” who would make a peace treaty with Israel to ensure peace for seven years. This marks the beginning of the final seven years of God’s plan for Israel which will culminate in the Jews returning to the Lord. Paul seized on that prospect. Israel would be saved and returned to the place of honor in God’s plan for the world.
And this final seven-year period would be the catalyst for this transformation and repentance. In the meantime, God established the church, beginning in Acts 2 and gave them the commission of sharing the Good News of salvation to the entire world–including the Jews. This we recognize as the church age. This was the “wild olive branch” being grafted into the tree.
We know from fulfilled prophecy, that what God said in the past has come true. So what has not yet been completed just requires a “bit of time” until that is completed. The Romans passage confirms that.
But that leaves one question for us to answer. Where is the Church and what part does it play in this final restoration? The final seven years is named, descriptively as the Tribulation. It is going to be a terrible time. Revelation 5 through 19 gives a vivid account of this time of destruction, leading up to the Battle of Armageddon and the Return of the Lord Jesus. But what part of this does the Chruch play?
Paul tells us of the Rapture, the catching away of believers at some time in the future. (1Corinthians15:50-56; and 1 Thessalonians 4:13-18) But the exact timing of that event is not delineated for us–here. But it seems that there are some specifics given. First turn to 2 Thessalonians 2:3-12 where Paul explains one detail of the “Day of the Lord.”
Let no one in any way deceive you, for it (Day of the Lord) will not come unless the apostasy comes first, and the man of lawlessness is revealed, the son of destruction, 4 who opposes and exalts himself above every so-called god or object of worship, so that he takes his seat in the temple of God, displaying himself as being God. 5 Do you not remember that while I was still with you, I was telling you these things? 6 And you know what restrains him now, so that in his time he will be revealed. 7 For the mystery of lawlessness is already at work; only he who now restrains will do so until he is taken out of the way. 8 Then that lawless one will be revealed whom the Lord will slay with the breath of His mouth and bring to an end by the appearance of His coming; 9 that is, the one whose coming is in accord with the activity of Satan, with all power and signs and false wonders, 10 and with all the deception of wickedness for those who perish, because they did not receive the love of the truth so as to be saved. 11 For this reason God will send upon them a deluding influence so that they will believe what is false, 12 in order that they all may be judged who did not believe the truth, but took pleasure in wickedness.
This “man of lawlessness” is the “prince to come” in Daniel 9. Daniel called his actions an “abomination.” Here Paul tells us that this guy, we call him the anti-Christ, will try to take the place of God. (Just by way of review, that happened way back there when Lucifer tried to exalt his throne above God. And Adam and Eve were encouraged to become God. And on, and on, and on. The trail will stop here.)
So this seems to indicate that the anti-Christ will not be revealed until “what restrains him” is removed from the earth. And what can restrain Satan and his work? That is the Holy Spirit. So this anti-Christ cannot appear until the Holy Spirit stops restraining him. And notice how the restraint will terminate. The One Who restrains will be taken out of the way.
What could that mean? Follow this logic carefully. The Church did not appear until the Messiah was cut off. And when Paul was talking about this in the life of the Jewish nation, he said that the branch was “broken off.” A new and different branch was grafted into the tree in its place. This is where the Church began the job that Israel had failed. That was the job of sharing the news of God’s redemption for all men. Paul’s other writings make clear the co-partnership of the Gentiles and the Jews in the Church. Galatians 3:28 says that the Jews and Gentiles are one in Christ, or the Church.
The influence of the Holy Spirit, living within individual members of the Church is definitely restraining the lawless one. It appears that Paul’s argument is that the indwelling Holy Spirit is the active agent involved in restraining the anti-Christ and his activity.
And for the Holy Spirit to be removed from the world, the individual believers in whom He dwells must leave also. Hence, the Pretribulation Rapture seems to emerge as the accurate interpretation. Now turn our attention to the Romans passage.
The branch was broken off, and a wild olive branch was grafted into the tree in its place. Focus specifically on v. 24.
...how much more will these who are the natural branches be grafted into their own olive tree?
Couple this with the seventy weeks of Daniel and we inevitably arrive at the conclusion that God’s plan was specific for Israel, 483 years. Then the Church for about 2000 years, and counting, follows. But the culmination God is seeking is specifically directed towards Israel. Daniel 9:24 specifically ties the “results” of the 490 years to Israel.
“Seventy weeks have been decreed for your people and your holy city, to finish the transgression, to make an end of sin, to make atonement for iniquity, to bring in everlasting righteousness, to seal up vision and prophecy and to anoint the most holy place."
First, the focus is on “your people.” Clearly, Daniel was a Jew. Your holy city, is Jerusalem. So the purpose of the full 490 year program is to effect some result in the nation of Israel. The specifics are listed.
1. To finish the transgression. The rejection of Christ as Messiah was merely the culmination of Jewish refusal to accept God’s plans.
2. “To make an end of sin,” will occur at the final judgment. Interestingly enough, Jesus seems to have identified a dual judgment. One that focuses on nations and a second one that deals with individuals. The second one is the Great White Throne judgment of Revelation 20. The Matthew 25 judgment is specifically for nations.
32 All the nations will be gathered before Him; and He will separate them from one another, as the shepherd separates the sheep from the goats; 33 and He will put the sheep on His right, and the goats on the left.
The sheep receive their reward. V. 34
34 “Then the King will say to those on His right, ‘Come, you who are blessed of My Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world.”
And the goats, likewise are judged. V. 41a
41 “Then He will also say to those on His left, ‘Depart from Me, accursed ones, into the eternal fire which has been prepared for the devil and his angels....”
So the sin of Israel is ended. They, as a nation, will follow their God. This prophecy is clearly directed toward Israel. Couple that with Romans 11: 26, 27.
...and so all Israel will be saved; just as it is written, “The Deliverer will come from Zion, He will remove ungodliness from Jacob.” 27 “This is My covenant with them, When I take away their sins.”
Did you notice the emphasis? All Israel will be saved and their sins are removed. Sounds just like Daniel, doesn’t it. And the conclusion of our thoughts is back in Romans. If Israel was “cut off” to allow the Gentiles and the Church to fulfill God’s redemptive plans, then is it logical that the Church will be “cut off” or taken out to make way for God’s plans for Israel? For them to be “grafted back into the tree?”
And the logical question is, “Where will the ‘native branch’ be grafted back into the tree?” Removing the Church by way of the Rapture makes all of this fit like a hand in a glove to all of the prophecies. And coupling that with the scenario in Revelation 7 where the 144,000 Jews are sealed and sent into the world to preach, we have a seamless transition from the Church age to the incipient Kingdom, later identified as the Millennium in chapter 20 of Revelation.
Removing the church heightens the prospect that the world will listen to the 144,000 Jews as they fan out throughout the world with the message that “Jesus has taken His own out of the world and will be back in seven years.” (Seven years minus the time since the treaty actuated by the anti-Christ, that is.)
And Jesus’ comment that no one knows the day or the hour that He will return must refer to the Rapture, as Daniel’s clock, which was literally fulfilled to the day for the “cutting off of Messiah,” will pinpoint when that Messiah will come back on His white horse in Revelation 19. It will be seven years after the treaty is effectuated.
So in this somewhat roundabout trail, we seem to have discovered a pre-Tribulation Rapture in Romans. We ought not be surprised as the Scripture is completely consistent and uniform throughout. We can trust its accuracy from Genesis to Revelation. If we find “contradictions” or lack of clarity, we can be assured that these “problems” lie in our interpretation and understanding and not with the corpus of Scripture.
We cry out with David, “Lord, I love Thy law.” (Psalm 119:97 and 113) And with John, “Even so, come Lord Jesus.” (Revelation 22:20)
Tuesday, June 30, 2020
Saturday, June 20, 2020
Smarter Than God?
Have you heard the phrase, “Richer than God?” I have heard some people described, erroneously, in those terms. Anyone who says that is merely displaying their ignorance. In that same line, sometimes we think we are smarter than God. (Hands up, Jim.)
There is an exchange in John 10 that, at one time, drove me crazy. Jesus had a great opportunity to proclaim, once and for all, that He was God. (Spoiler alert. Wake up, Jimbo. You missed it.)
Let’s look at the passage and spike a few cannons. By way of background, Jesus has just healed the man born blind. Some believed that He must be the Messiah while others argued that since He did it on the Sabbath, He could not be from God. The controversy continued on in the celebration of the feast of Dedication. The Jews specifically demanded that He tell them whether He was the Messiah or not. John 10:24-30
The Jews then gathered around Him, and were saying to Him, “How long will You keep us in suspense? If You are the Christ, tell us plainly.” 25 Jesus answered them, “I told you, and you do not believe; the works that I do in My Father’s name, these testify of Me. 26 But you do not believe because you are not of My sheep. 27 My sheep hear My voice, and I know them, and they follow Me; 28 and I give eternal life to them, and they will never perish; and no one will snatch them out of My hand. 29 My Father, who has given them to Me, is greater than all; and no one is able to snatch them out of the Father’s hand. 30 I and the Father are one.”
This is pretty self-explanatory. “I told you that I am the Messiah and you will not believe. Check out My “works.” (This is a clear appeal to the Old Testament that prophesied that the Messiah would make the lame walk, the blind see, and the deaf hear. (Isaiah 35:5, 6) The “Worker” of those things is here. They could see with their own eyes these miracles. Pardon the contextual pun.
We will skip the little segue into His sheep. Not because it is not important, but because it does not apply to our thought. His sheep are as secure as if they were in the Father’s hand: Because they are. But I digress.
Then Jesus dropped the bombshell. (An anachronism if there ever was one.) “I and the Father are one.” He did not mean “one in purpose,” as some cults have tried to reinterpret this. He meant that He, Jesus, and the Father were literally the same Being. Later on (John 14:9) He explained to Phillip that “He who has seen Me has seen the Father.” And we can be assured that the Jews understood this explicitly. They took up stones to execute Him.
They would not do this if Jesus had said that He was merely trying to accomplish the work of God, as did Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, and all of the prophets. He could have included John the Baptist in the list as well. No one was stoned because he claimed to extend or repeat the work of anyone on this list.
Jesus challenged their impending attack immediately. (V. 31, 32)
The Jews picked up stones again to stone Him. 32 Jesus answered them, “I showed you many good works from the Father; for which of them are you stoning Me?”
Their answer is clear, concise, and conclusive. (V. 33)
The Jews answered Him, “For a good work we do not stone You, but for blasphemy; and because You, being a man, make Yourself out to be God.”
And here is where I thought that I was smarter than God-Jesus. I wished that Jesus had merely said, “Yes, I am God. And your stones will bounce off, proving My point and shutting your mouths permanently–along with those of many subsequent cults to follow.” But He didn’t. (34-36)
Jesus answered them, “Has it not been written in your Law, ‘I said, you are gods’? 35 If he called them gods, to whom the word of God came (and the Scripture cannot be broken), 36 do you say of Him, whom the Father sanctified and sent into the world, ‘You are blaspheming,’ because I said, ‘I am the Son of God’?
“No!” I screamed. That is exactly the wrong answer. Now You have empowered all the “little ‘g’ cults” when they claim that You merely equated Yourself with those who heard God’s Word in the past.
“Granted,” their argument goes, “Jesus is probably a level or two above those prophets, but He is not on the same level as God.”
And if we stop reading at this point, the point is won by the negative. “Jesus is not THE God. Big ‘G’ God.” He is merely an elevated being, like a super-angel or something.
But Jesus did not stop there, and John recorded it for us. J and J were definitely smarter than Jim.
37 If I do not do the works of My Father, do not believe Me; 38 but if I do them, though you do not believe Me, believe the works, so that you may know and understand that the Father is in Me, and I in the Father.” 39 Therefore they were seeking again to seize Him, and He eluded their grasp.
Jesus could have corrected their incorrect perception of Him if that had been the error. “No, guys, I am not The God. Back off.”
Instead, He twisted the knife even deeper. The works testify to the fact that Jesus was, in His words, “in the Father, and the Father was in Him.” This was clearly not a denial of equality with God, as evidenced by the reaction of His opponents. They continued their quest to execute Him for blasphemy, for claiming to be God. But they failed–again.
But what about that verse? Let’s look at it. Ps 82:2-6
How long will you judge unjustly And show partiality to the wicked? Selah. 3 Vindicate the weak and fatherless; Do justice to the afflicted and destitute. 4 Rescue the weak and needy; Deliver them out of the hand of the wicked. 5 They do not know nor do they understand; They walk about in darkness; All the foundations of the earth are shaken.
The LORD is addressing the leaders of Israel, that is the priests and leaders. (No Scribes and Pharisees, yet.) And look at their works. If the Jews recognized this passage, they knew that Jesus was parroting and redirecting the charges against the ancient leaders. The Psalmist, under the guidance of the Holy Spirit continued quoting the Lord.
6 I said, “You are gods, And all of you are sons of the Most High.
Now Jesus’ intent is clear. God called those leaders, “gods” and they certainly earned the scorn. Conversely, Jesus did redemptive miracles, releasing people from plagues. And He was literally fulfilling the prophecies for when the Messiah would walk on earth. Messiah equals God. And the leaders knew that. Look at their response. V. 39 tells us that they were doubly convinced that He was blaspheming.
And what about my brilliant analysis of Jesus’ “mistake?” Well, had He not used that verse, some current cult could have seized on it to “downgrade” His claim. He was aligned with Jehovah as were the leaders in Psalm 82, they could claim. Jesus would also have been relegated to the “little g” designation as merely one who heard from Jehovah and carried out His designs.
By usurping that argument, and letting the Jewish leaders verify it’s failure to “corral Him” in the little g remuda, this argument was effectively countered. Cannon spiked, to utilize a nice anachronism, the second or third one of the day. But that was not the complete purpose. Read on in John.
40 And He went away again beyond the Jordan to the place where John was first baptizing, and He was staying there. 41 Many came to Him and were saying, “While John performed no sign, yet everything John said about this man was true.” 42 Many believed in Him there.
Remember those “works” that Jesus cited? They were the calling card (anachronism number four) of the Messiah. John (the Baptist) did not do miracles. He was not the Messiah. But This ONE did! John had pointed to Jesus as the Lamb of God and many understood that this was also the Messiah. And the results? V. 42, “Many believed in Him there.”
Message received and acted upon. They accepted Him as the, their, Messiah. The “nattering nabobs of negativism” (not sure what that is) had failed to dissuade a large number of listeners. (Many believed.)
Was Jesus’ line of argumentation a mistake? Me genoito (Paul’s favorite negation. Absolutely, positively, not! May it never be.) And Jimmy boy is glad to admit the error of trying to correct Him. Jesus did not make a mistake. He perfectly responded to the question at hand, and deftly deflected any future ones that may arise.
We just have to blurt Romans 11:33-35.
Oh, the depth of the riches both of the wisdom and knowledge of God! How unsearchable are His judgments and unfathomable His ways! (And arguments: Editor) 34 For who has known the mind of the Lord, or who became His counselor? 35 Or who has first given to Him that it might be paid back to him again? 36 For from Him and through Him and to Him are all things. To Him be the glory forever.
Who has taught Him something or anything? Who has added to or aided His arguments? Who is smarter than He? We all, with Paul, repeat the implied, “Nobody!”
And I am so glad that is true. Glory.
There is an exchange in John 10 that, at one time, drove me crazy. Jesus had a great opportunity to proclaim, once and for all, that He was God. (Spoiler alert. Wake up, Jimbo. You missed it.)
Let’s look at the passage and spike a few cannons. By way of background, Jesus has just healed the man born blind. Some believed that He must be the Messiah while others argued that since He did it on the Sabbath, He could not be from God. The controversy continued on in the celebration of the feast of Dedication. The Jews specifically demanded that He tell them whether He was the Messiah or not. John 10:24-30
The Jews then gathered around Him, and were saying to Him, “How long will You keep us in suspense? If You are the Christ, tell us plainly.” 25 Jesus answered them, “I told you, and you do not believe; the works that I do in My Father’s name, these testify of Me. 26 But you do not believe because you are not of My sheep. 27 My sheep hear My voice, and I know them, and they follow Me; 28 and I give eternal life to them, and they will never perish; and no one will snatch them out of My hand. 29 My Father, who has given them to Me, is greater than all; and no one is able to snatch them out of the Father’s hand. 30 I and the Father are one.”
This is pretty self-explanatory. “I told you that I am the Messiah and you will not believe. Check out My “works.” (This is a clear appeal to the Old Testament that prophesied that the Messiah would make the lame walk, the blind see, and the deaf hear. (Isaiah 35:5, 6) The “Worker” of those things is here. They could see with their own eyes these miracles. Pardon the contextual pun.
We will skip the little segue into His sheep. Not because it is not important, but because it does not apply to our thought. His sheep are as secure as if they were in the Father’s hand: Because they are. But I digress.
Then Jesus dropped the bombshell. (An anachronism if there ever was one.) “I and the Father are one.” He did not mean “one in purpose,” as some cults have tried to reinterpret this. He meant that He, Jesus, and the Father were literally the same Being. Later on (John 14:9) He explained to Phillip that “He who has seen Me has seen the Father.” And we can be assured that the Jews understood this explicitly. They took up stones to execute Him.
They would not do this if Jesus had said that He was merely trying to accomplish the work of God, as did Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, and all of the prophets. He could have included John the Baptist in the list as well. No one was stoned because he claimed to extend or repeat the work of anyone on this list.
Jesus challenged their impending attack immediately. (V. 31, 32)
The Jews picked up stones again to stone Him. 32 Jesus answered them, “I showed you many good works from the Father; for which of them are you stoning Me?”
Their answer is clear, concise, and conclusive. (V. 33)
The Jews answered Him, “For a good work we do not stone You, but for blasphemy; and because You, being a man, make Yourself out to be God.”
And here is where I thought that I was smarter than God-Jesus. I wished that Jesus had merely said, “Yes, I am God. And your stones will bounce off, proving My point and shutting your mouths permanently–along with those of many subsequent cults to follow.” But He didn’t. (34-36)
Jesus answered them, “Has it not been written in your Law, ‘I said, you are gods’? 35 If he called them gods, to whom the word of God came (and the Scripture cannot be broken), 36 do you say of Him, whom the Father sanctified and sent into the world, ‘You are blaspheming,’ because I said, ‘I am the Son of God’?
“No!” I screamed. That is exactly the wrong answer. Now You have empowered all the “little ‘g’ cults” when they claim that You merely equated Yourself with those who heard God’s Word in the past.
“Granted,” their argument goes, “Jesus is probably a level or two above those prophets, but He is not on the same level as God.”
And if we stop reading at this point, the point is won by the negative. “Jesus is not THE God. Big ‘G’ God.” He is merely an elevated being, like a super-angel or something.
But Jesus did not stop there, and John recorded it for us. J and J were definitely smarter than Jim.
37 If I do not do the works of My Father, do not believe Me; 38 but if I do them, though you do not believe Me, believe the works, so that you may know and understand that the Father is in Me, and I in the Father.” 39 Therefore they were seeking again to seize Him, and He eluded their grasp.
Jesus could have corrected their incorrect perception of Him if that had been the error. “No, guys, I am not The God. Back off.”
Instead, He twisted the knife even deeper. The works testify to the fact that Jesus was, in His words, “in the Father, and the Father was in Him.” This was clearly not a denial of equality with God, as evidenced by the reaction of His opponents. They continued their quest to execute Him for blasphemy, for claiming to be God. But they failed–again.
But what about that verse? Let’s look at it. Ps 82:2-6
How long will you judge unjustly And show partiality to the wicked? Selah. 3 Vindicate the weak and fatherless; Do justice to the afflicted and destitute. 4 Rescue the weak and needy; Deliver them out of the hand of the wicked. 5 They do not know nor do they understand; They walk about in darkness; All the foundations of the earth are shaken.
The LORD is addressing the leaders of Israel, that is the priests and leaders. (No Scribes and Pharisees, yet.) And look at their works. If the Jews recognized this passage, they knew that Jesus was parroting and redirecting the charges against the ancient leaders. The Psalmist, under the guidance of the Holy Spirit continued quoting the Lord.
6 I said, “You are gods, And all of you are sons of the Most High.
Now Jesus’ intent is clear. God called those leaders, “gods” and they certainly earned the scorn. Conversely, Jesus did redemptive miracles, releasing people from plagues. And He was literally fulfilling the prophecies for when the Messiah would walk on earth. Messiah equals God. And the leaders knew that. Look at their response. V. 39 tells us that they were doubly convinced that He was blaspheming.
And what about my brilliant analysis of Jesus’ “mistake?” Well, had He not used that verse, some current cult could have seized on it to “downgrade” His claim. He was aligned with Jehovah as were the leaders in Psalm 82, they could claim. Jesus would also have been relegated to the “little g” designation as merely one who heard from Jehovah and carried out His designs.
By usurping that argument, and letting the Jewish leaders verify it’s failure to “corral Him” in the little g remuda, this argument was effectively countered. Cannon spiked, to utilize a nice anachronism, the second or third one of the day. But that was not the complete purpose. Read on in John.
40 And He went away again beyond the Jordan to the place where John was first baptizing, and He was staying there. 41 Many came to Him and were saying, “While John performed no sign, yet everything John said about this man was true.” 42 Many believed in Him there.
Remember those “works” that Jesus cited? They were the calling card (anachronism number four) of the Messiah. John (the Baptist) did not do miracles. He was not the Messiah. But This ONE did! John had pointed to Jesus as the Lamb of God and many understood that this was also the Messiah. And the results? V. 42, “Many believed in Him there.”
Message received and acted upon. They accepted Him as the, their, Messiah. The “nattering nabobs of negativism” (not sure what that is) had failed to dissuade a large number of listeners. (Many believed.)
Was Jesus’ line of argumentation a mistake? Me genoito (Paul’s favorite negation. Absolutely, positively, not! May it never be.) And Jimmy boy is glad to admit the error of trying to correct Him. Jesus did not make a mistake. He perfectly responded to the question at hand, and deftly deflected any future ones that may arise.
We just have to blurt Romans 11:33-35.
Oh, the depth of the riches both of the wisdom and knowledge of God! How unsearchable are His judgments and unfathomable His ways! (And arguments: Editor) 34 For who has known the mind of the Lord, or who became His counselor? 35 Or who has first given to Him that it might be paid back to him again? 36 For from Him and through Him and to Him are all things. To Him be the glory forever.
Who has taught Him something or anything? Who has added to or aided His arguments? Who is smarter than He? We all, with Paul, repeat the implied, “Nobody!”
And I am so glad that is true. Glory.
Friday, May 8, 2020
Mean to Cults?
Am I mean to cults or false believers? Let’s rephrase the question. If you see someone heading for a bridge that has been washed out and you warn them about the danger, are you being mean to them? It would appear that rather than assessing the actions as “mean” or cruel, they would be considered kind and compassionate.
Likewise, when I encounter someone who has incorrect beliefs, I try to lovingly point them to the truth. Here is an example. It is repeated in all three Synoptic Gospels. In Mark 10:17 Jesus is approached by the Rich Young Ruler. (It is repeated in Matthew 19:16 and Luke 18:18.)
As He was setting out on a journey, a man ran up to Him and knelt before Him, and asked Him, “Good Teacher, what shall I do to inherit eternal life?”
I like to follow the example of a good teacher. Here we have the Good Teacher. There are two points to the question and three to the answer. First, the RYL called Jesus, “Good.” Here is Jesus’ reply. V. 18
And Jesus said to him, “Why do you call Me good? No one is good except God alone.
Jesus’ first response was to answer the underlying assumption of the question. Was Jesus denying that He was good? On the contrary, He was reaffirming what His questioner had stated. In their understanding, only God was good. Therefore the ruler was affirming that Jesus was God. Instead of contradicting him, Jesus continued to answer the second part of the question. “How can I ‘inherit eternal life’ or be saved?” He gave the answer that God would give. V. 19
“You know the commandments, ‘Do not murder, Do not commit adultery, Do not steal, Do not bear false witness, Do not defraud, Honor your father and mother.’”
Jesus then referenced the Ten Commandments. The response from RYL gave Jesus the opportunity to answer the real question by confronting false beliefs. V. 20
And he said to Him, “Teacher, I have kept all these things from my youth up.”
And here we find the heart of the Master Teacher. V. 21 begins with, “Looking at him, Jesus felt a love for him....” This is the heart that I want to have for false beliefs. What was wrong with what the man said? Check the response again. Jesus’ love, or compassion, as some versions translate it was for the person and because his beliefs were sincerely wrong.
He claimed to have “kept the commandments from his youth up.” Think of that! He was far superior to all of the Jews from Moses’ day on the present. No one had kept the commandments. Before Moses had brought the two tablets down from the mountain, the people had broken every one of them. (Exodus 32) Moses threw the tablets to the ground, shattering them, in a display of the fact that they had “broken the Law.”
Since no one could keep them, God had given Moses the instructions for building the Tabernacle, the Tent of Meeting, where people could come to make atonement and receive forgiveness. (Exodus 20-31) In our story today, Jesus needed to shatter the confidence, false confidence really, of his petitioner. V. 21 This is the third point of His answer.
...and said to him, “One thing you lack: go and sell all you possess and give to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven; and come, follow Me.” 22 But at these words he was saddened, and he went away grieving, for he was one who owned much property.
Jesus was not trying to hurt the RYL. But as long as His visitor believed that he was okay, Jesus could not help him. Aside from hypochondriacs, no one takes medicine until they are sick. And at times we need a doctor to tell us that we are sick and need to take some medicine. “Doctor” Jesus had diagnosed our friend’s problem. It was the same as the Pharisee in Jesus’ story in Luke 18:9-14. The Pharisee was bragging about how good he was, rather than seeing his extreme need. Jesus did not get to “heal” him. The Publican recognized his need and asked for “medicine.”
And, like someone who receives medicine for a disease and refuses to take it, the RYL chose to remain “ill” instead of getting well. This is tragic, yet, Jesus did not interfere with the choice. He watched the man grieve, not for his sins, but, having put his possessions above God, he had a god that could not save. That was the first Commandment, broken as surely as the tablets in Exodus. Sadly, he was unwilling to change his allegiance. We grieve with Jesus.
This story has some critical applications. First, Jesus established His authority to answer the question, “How can I be saved?” He was God and His answer was literally, “The Word from God.” When a cult member or other unbeliever approaches us, they are looking for a Word from God. If I give my “word” that is worthless. But if I convey God’s Word, they will know the Truth. Whether they accept it or not, is their decision.
Think about it. Why would a cult member join the group? They want to be saved. So when they come to me, I can either leave them in their error or point them to the truth. (I do not seek them out to interdict their lives. The Rich Young Ruler came to Jesus. When people approach me, I feel justified, and in fact, compelled to answer their “question.”)
Now a little psychology. When people with false beliefs cross our paths, we must recognize that they often are personally committed to this position or concept. There is an erroneous belief involved, and logical presentation of the truth should counter it. But the commitment is not logical and reasonable. The person has personally identified with this. There is an emotional involvement and it has become who they are.
Contradicting that misconception is perceived as a personal attack on not just their beliefs, but on themselves, on who they are. That is why Jesus was so gentle. He did not say, “You are wrong! You are a sinner! You haven’t kept the commandments, No one, you included, can or has kept them.” Instead, he gently pointed to the first one that had been violated. The litigant was “sorrowful,” because he would not be able to give up his “other” god.
I had a Jehovah’s Witness member visit me several times in his attempt to “convert” me. I pointed him to the error of his rejection of Jesus as God. He relied on his faulty translation of John 1:1 that described Jesus as “a god.” (Little G, and not equal with God the Father.) We had several rounds of discussion, yet neither seemed to prevail.
On our last visit, I turned him to his own “translation,” and I use the word loosely, where, in Hebrews 1, God the Father called Jesus, the Son, God. (Hebrews 1:8) This was not my NASB or any other translation. It was his own book. He refused to believe it. I asked him what did it mean if not what it said.
He averred that even though it “said” that, that was not what it meant. So I asked what it meant. “Not that,” was his reply. He adamantly refused to answer what it meant. The logic, reason, and literal words did not dissuade him.
He had told me that he had been a JW since 1974, which, at the time, was 35 years or so. He could not and would not change. I prayed for him and still do, when I think of him. Jesus could get through to Saul of Tarsus, and He is still in the “convincing” business.
Jesus had love for the seeker when He was here on earth. He still does, and when Jesus sends a seeker to us, we first love them, then gently turn them to the Truth, which ultimately, is Jesus.
Am I mean or cruel to confront cults and other false beliefs? Or am I following my Leader, in showing compassion and pointing to the Truth? I will continue until He stops me.
Likewise, when I encounter someone who has incorrect beliefs, I try to lovingly point them to the truth. Here is an example. It is repeated in all three Synoptic Gospels. In Mark 10:17 Jesus is approached by the Rich Young Ruler. (It is repeated in Matthew 19:16 and Luke 18:18.)
As He was setting out on a journey, a man ran up to Him and knelt before Him, and asked Him, “Good Teacher, what shall I do to inherit eternal life?”
I like to follow the example of a good teacher. Here we have the Good Teacher. There are two points to the question and three to the answer. First, the RYL called Jesus, “Good.” Here is Jesus’ reply. V. 18
And Jesus said to him, “Why do you call Me good? No one is good except God alone.
Jesus’ first response was to answer the underlying assumption of the question. Was Jesus denying that He was good? On the contrary, He was reaffirming what His questioner had stated. In their understanding, only God was good. Therefore the ruler was affirming that Jesus was God. Instead of contradicting him, Jesus continued to answer the second part of the question. “How can I ‘inherit eternal life’ or be saved?” He gave the answer that God would give. V. 19
“You know the commandments, ‘Do not murder, Do not commit adultery, Do not steal, Do not bear false witness, Do not defraud, Honor your father and mother.’”
Jesus then referenced the Ten Commandments. The response from RYL gave Jesus the opportunity to answer the real question by confronting false beliefs. V. 20
And he said to Him, “Teacher, I have kept all these things from my youth up.”
And here we find the heart of the Master Teacher. V. 21 begins with, “Looking at him, Jesus felt a love for him....” This is the heart that I want to have for false beliefs. What was wrong with what the man said? Check the response again. Jesus’ love, or compassion, as some versions translate it was for the person and because his beliefs were sincerely wrong.
He claimed to have “kept the commandments from his youth up.” Think of that! He was far superior to all of the Jews from Moses’ day on the present. No one had kept the commandments. Before Moses had brought the two tablets down from the mountain, the people had broken every one of them. (Exodus 32) Moses threw the tablets to the ground, shattering them, in a display of the fact that they had “broken the Law.”
Since no one could keep them, God had given Moses the instructions for building the Tabernacle, the Tent of Meeting, where people could come to make atonement and receive forgiveness. (Exodus 20-31) In our story today, Jesus needed to shatter the confidence, false confidence really, of his petitioner. V. 21 This is the third point of His answer.
...and said to him, “One thing you lack: go and sell all you possess and give to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven; and come, follow Me.” 22 But at these words he was saddened, and he went away grieving, for he was one who owned much property.
Jesus was not trying to hurt the RYL. But as long as His visitor believed that he was okay, Jesus could not help him. Aside from hypochondriacs, no one takes medicine until they are sick. And at times we need a doctor to tell us that we are sick and need to take some medicine. “Doctor” Jesus had diagnosed our friend’s problem. It was the same as the Pharisee in Jesus’ story in Luke 18:9-14. The Pharisee was bragging about how good he was, rather than seeing his extreme need. Jesus did not get to “heal” him. The Publican recognized his need and asked for “medicine.”
And, like someone who receives medicine for a disease and refuses to take it, the RYL chose to remain “ill” instead of getting well. This is tragic, yet, Jesus did not interfere with the choice. He watched the man grieve, not for his sins, but, having put his possessions above God, he had a god that could not save. That was the first Commandment, broken as surely as the tablets in Exodus. Sadly, he was unwilling to change his allegiance. We grieve with Jesus.
This story has some critical applications. First, Jesus established His authority to answer the question, “How can I be saved?” He was God and His answer was literally, “The Word from God.” When a cult member or other unbeliever approaches us, they are looking for a Word from God. If I give my “word” that is worthless. But if I convey God’s Word, they will know the Truth. Whether they accept it or not, is their decision.
Think about it. Why would a cult member join the group? They want to be saved. So when they come to me, I can either leave them in their error or point them to the truth. (I do not seek them out to interdict their lives. The Rich Young Ruler came to Jesus. When people approach me, I feel justified, and in fact, compelled to answer their “question.”)
Now a little psychology. When people with false beliefs cross our paths, we must recognize that they often are personally committed to this position or concept. There is an erroneous belief involved, and logical presentation of the truth should counter it. But the commitment is not logical and reasonable. The person has personally identified with this. There is an emotional involvement and it has become who they are.
Contradicting that misconception is perceived as a personal attack on not just their beliefs, but on themselves, on who they are. That is why Jesus was so gentle. He did not say, “You are wrong! You are a sinner! You haven’t kept the commandments, No one, you included, can or has kept them.” Instead, he gently pointed to the first one that had been violated. The litigant was “sorrowful,” because he would not be able to give up his “other” god.
I had a Jehovah’s Witness member visit me several times in his attempt to “convert” me. I pointed him to the error of his rejection of Jesus as God. He relied on his faulty translation of John 1:1 that described Jesus as “a god.” (Little G, and not equal with God the Father.) We had several rounds of discussion, yet neither seemed to prevail.
On our last visit, I turned him to his own “translation,” and I use the word loosely, where, in Hebrews 1, God the Father called Jesus, the Son, God. (Hebrews 1:8) This was not my NASB or any other translation. It was his own book. He refused to believe it. I asked him what did it mean if not what it said.
He averred that even though it “said” that, that was not what it meant. So I asked what it meant. “Not that,” was his reply. He adamantly refused to answer what it meant. The logic, reason, and literal words did not dissuade him.
He had told me that he had been a JW since 1974, which, at the time, was 35 years or so. He could not and would not change. I prayed for him and still do, when I think of him. Jesus could get through to Saul of Tarsus, and He is still in the “convincing” business.
Jesus had love for the seeker when He was here on earth. He still does, and when Jesus sends a seeker to us, we first love them, then gently turn them to the Truth, which ultimately, is Jesus.
Am I mean or cruel to confront cults and other false beliefs? Or am I following my Leader, in showing compassion and pointing to the Truth? I will continue until He stops me.
Thursday, April 9, 2020
Deity of Jesus Revisited
We have examined this question several times in the past, but it does not hurt to brush up on the basics occasionally. Vince Lombardi, the coach of the world champion Green Bay Packers, is said to have begun some of his team meetings by holding up an object.”This, Gentlemen, is a football.”
And Coach Lombardi seemed to realize some modicum of success with his approach to fundamental principles. We must never be oblivious to challenges to the deity of Christ. They sneak up on us in various ways and if we are not, as Peter said, “...ready always to give a defense for the glorious hope within us,” we will either be overwhelmed argumentatively, or miss an opportunity to correct error when it is presented. (1 Peter 3:15) And while we are at it, check out
2 Peter 1:12.
Therefore, I will always be ready to remind you of these things, even though you already know them, and have been established in the truth which is present with you.
Peter seems to have been of the “Lombardi school” of instruction. (Or maybe Lombardi followed Peter.) You already know this, but it does not hurt to repeat it.
The first time I encountered the argument that Jesus was not God was when on a high school evaluation trip in eastern Illinois. I, and the guy rooming with me, were there to evaluate the various departments of the high school in their quest to satisfy certification requirements.
It seems like the first night we roomed together, we shared our various teaching duties. I told him that I was the chemistry teacher and the debate coach. “Did you ever debate a philosophical question, like, ‘Was Jesus really God?’” he asked.
“No,” I replied, “we only debate policy issues, and besides, debate always has two somewhat tenable propositions. Otherwise, it is not fair for the team that draws the ‘losing’ issue.”
“Oh, there are many who do not believe that Jesus was really God,” he rejoined.
I explained that this was really just taking an oddball cult and giving it credence. To which he replied that it was not all that much out of the mainstream. Oops, I had unwittingly stepped on some toes there. “Do you question that?” I asked.
“Why do you believe that he was God?” he countered. (Capitalization applied as he intended.)
“Well, John 1:1 tells us that,” I replied, falling neatly into his trap. “In the beginning was the Word and the Word was with God and the Word was God.” End of discussion, I thought.
“Did you know that in my translation, the New World Translation, it says that the Word was “a god?”
“Nope,” I responded. “That must be an error.”
His answer surprised me. “Have you ever read it in the original Greek?” The trap was sprung. “I just happen to have a Greek New Testament here. Let’s check it out.” (Actually, it wasn’t “Greek” it was an English transliteration, but the point was lost on me. No difference, anyway.)
We turned to John and there, in verse 1 were “two different” words for “God.” Well, my mouth was shut. I had no answer. And then trap number two was set. “The Council of Nicea, in AD 325, invented (his word) the doctrine of the Trinity. Before that, no one really believed it.” Snap!
I backpedaled and stalled. I got his address and, promising to write, began a year-long correspondence on this issue. First, I had to resolve the questions, should I say “doubts,” that he planted. Then, as I discovered the paucity of reason and truth in his arguments, and pointed them out, he rolled out one after another.
How would you have fared there? Want some help? Well, you know that we are going to do that. Why else would we have come this far?
Point one: I went to Dr. Dunn, our Pastor in Peoria and showed him the Greek conundrum. I did not have a Greek New Testament, and still do not, but rightly surmised that he did and he gladly pulled it out. “See, right there, two words for “God” are there.” Theos and theon. Dr. Dunn burst out in a chortle that was half amusement, half consternation, and half ridicule. (Yes, I know that doesn’t add up. Neither does the argument.)
“That is what happens when you try to read a language that you do not know,” he answered. “You know that there are cases in English for pronouns. ‘He’ and ‘him’ are the same word, the same person, but different cases, subjective and objective. Greek has cases for nouns. Theos is the subjective case, Theon is objective. They mean the same Person, God.”
So the New World “Translation” is a bad translation. In fact, a little research revealed that the crew that “translated” it had one guy who had taken one semester of college Greek and the rest were, at best, self-taught. Essentially, it was a copy of an English edition with the references to Jesus’ deity excised or revised. We will come back to this a little later.
Point two: I do not remember if I asked Dr. Dunn about the Council of Nicea, but a very simple bit of research (an interesting project back then, before Al Gore had invented the internet, but I digress) research revealed that this particular Council was called for the explicit purpose of CONDEMNING the heresy that Jesus was not God. It did affirm that He was God, but only because the body of Biblical truth and writing from M, M, L, and J on had declared it. The majority of the church accepted that doctrine and a small, but influential offshoot, had caused the controversy.
So my friend, Lincoln was his name, had totally reversed the purpose and declaration of the Nicean Council and bamboozled me. I should have stopped writing to him with that letter. As it turned out, every rebuttal I sent him was met with a new claim of Biblical error on the part of deists. This continued for a whole year or more. Finally, his response was to raise the Council of Nicea–again.
About that time, I noticed an article on cults in Moody Monthly. It listed several different cults and their leaders, and one, under the basic aegis of Jehovah’s Witnesses, but a deviation, was some named group, originated and led by a certain Lincoln. Now I knew why he was unconvinced by my arguments. This was his baby.
David Jeremiah was talking about doubt the other day and used some terms that apply here. There are “honest doubters” who are asking questions and are amenable to proof. Then there are dishonest doubters who have a set position and are merely arguing with no intention of learning the truth, or changing their position.
Dr. Jeremiah gave an example of a man who was convinced that he was dead. His psychiatrist tried to help him back to reality. “Do dead men bleed?”
“No,” was the answer. Then he was instructed to walk around for a week repeating that, “Dead men do not bleed.” When he came back a week later the doctor asked him again.
“Do dead men bleed?”
“No,” was the response. Then the doctor took a pin and pricked the finger of his patient. A drop of blood pooled on his finger. “Well, what do you know! Dead men do bleed!”
Dishonest doubt cannot be persuaded. I should have saved my postage. Fortunately, it was much less than it is now, so I guess we can chalk it up to being a witness, being ready to answer.
And, just for reference, a few verses that show the deity of Jesus are found in Revelation (21:6; 22:13) where He is called the first and the last, the beginning and the end, the alpha and the omega. Isaiah 41:4 and 44:6 repeat that. The Old Testament “Jehovah” or better, Yahweh is the same as the New Testament Jesus.
And the New World “T” did not find all of the references to Jesus being God. I had a guy who came back to my porch several times and I asked him if he had a Bible. Of course, he did and trotted out his NWT. We turned to Hebrews 1, and even in that poor translation, I found what I wanted. (I will quote NASB, but it is in their version–at least until someone finds it and removes it.) I began with verse 6
And when He again brings the firstborn into the world, He says, “And let all the angels of God worship Him.”
The “He” is God the Father. And He commanded the angels to “worship” the Son. But the OT specifically says that there is only One God, check the Isaiah references, and the commandments forbid worshiping any other god. So if NWT is right in John 1, then the Father, Jehovah, just contravened His own word. But I didn’t stop there.
Slide your finger down to verse 8: (“He” is again God, the Father)
But of the Son He says, “Your throne, O God, is forever and ever,
God the Father called the Son, “O God!” And, I have to sadly report that the visitor was a dishonest doubter. He denied that it meant what it said. He refused. He could not provide a different meaning, and he left. He has not returned.
A couple more quick notes. I will not comment on these, except to confirm that LORD in the Old Testament is Yahweh, or Jehovah. You can figure them out.
Isaiah 40:3 The voice of him that crieth in the wilderness, Prepare ye the way of the Lord, make straight in the desert a highway for our God.
Malachi 3:1 Behold, I will send my messenger, and he shall prepare the way before me: and the Lord, whom ye seek, shall suddenly come to his temple, even the messenger of the covenant, whom ye delight in: behold, he shall come, saith the Lord of hosts.
Matthew 3:3 For this is he that was spoken of by the prophet Isaiah, saying, The voice of one crying in the wilderness, Prepare ye the way of the Lord, make his paths straight.
Mark 1:3 The voice of one crying in the wilderness, Prepare ye the way of the Lord, make his paths straight.
Luke 1:76 And thou, child, shalt be called the prophet of the Highest: for thou shalt go before the face of the Lord to prepare his ways; (John the Baptist)
Luke 3:4 As it is written in the book of the words of Isaiah the prophet, saying, The voice of one crying in the wilderness, Prepare ye the way of the Lord, make his paths straight.
And for my last magic trick turn to Luke 19:44. Some translations render this as “time of your visitation.” Others, like CSB say:
They will crush you and your children among you to the ground, and they will not leave one stone on another in your midst, because you did not recognize the time when God visited you.”
Who visited them? Zechariah 9:9 spells it out, as:
Rejoice greatly, Daughter Zion! Shout in triumph, Daughter Jerusalem! Look, your King is coming to you; he is righteous and victorious, humble and riding on a donkey, on a colt, the foal of a donkey.
Jesus was the One Who visited them. This is confirmed in all four Gospels. (Matthew 21, Mark 11, Luke 19, John 12) God, in the flesh, appeared and presented Himself as God, King, and Messiah. They refused, and rejected Him. But that is for another day. Pardon the pun.
For our purpose today, Jesus was and is God. His deity was accepted and taught by His disciples, their followers, and true believers ever since. My friend Lincoln notwithstanding, that question is not a viable debate topic.
Vince would be pleased that we know what a “football” is.
Jesus is Lord: The LORD. Amen.
And Coach Lombardi seemed to realize some modicum of success with his approach to fundamental principles. We must never be oblivious to challenges to the deity of Christ. They sneak up on us in various ways and if we are not, as Peter said, “...ready always to give a defense for the glorious hope within us,” we will either be overwhelmed argumentatively, or miss an opportunity to correct error when it is presented. (1 Peter 3:15) And while we are at it, check out
2 Peter 1:12.
Therefore, I will always be ready to remind you of these things, even though you already know them, and have been established in the truth which is present with you.
Peter seems to have been of the “Lombardi school” of instruction. (Or maybe Lombardi followed Peter.) You already know this, but it does not hurt to repeat it.
The first time I encountered the argument that Jesus was not God was when on a high school evaluation trip in eastern Illinois. I, and the guy rooming with me, were there to evaluate the various departments of the high school in their quest to satisfy certification requirements.
It seems like the first night we roomed together, we shared our various teaching duties. I told him that I was the chemistry teacher and the debate coach. “Did you ever debate a philosophical question, like, ‘Was Jesus really God?’” he asked.
“No,” I replied, “we only debate policy issues, and besides, debate always has two somewhat tenable propositions. Otherwise, it is not fair for the team that draws the ‘losing’ issue.”
“Oh, there are many who do not believe that Jesus was really God,” he rejoined.
I explained that this was really just taking an oddball cult and giving it credence. To which he replied that it was not all that much out of the mainstream. Oops, I had unwittingly stepped on some toes there. “Do you question that?” I asked.
“Why do you believe that he was God?” he countered. (Capitalization applied as he intended.)
“Well, John 1:1 tells us that,” I replied, falling neatly into his trap. “In the beginning was the Word and the Word was with God and the Word was God.” End of discussion, I thought.
“Did you know that in my translation, the New World Translation, it says that the Word was “a god?”
“Nope,” I responded. “That must be an error.”
His answer surprised me. “Have you ever read it in the original Greek?” The trap was sprung. “I just happen to have a Greek New Testament here. Let’s check it out.” (Actually, it wasn’t “Greek” it was an English transliteration, but the point was lost on me. No difference, anyway.)
We turned to John and there, in verse 1 were “two different” words for “God.” Well, my mouth was shut. I had no answer. And then trap number two was set. “The Council of Nicea, in AD 325, invented (his word) the doctrine of the Trinity. Before that, no one really believed it.” Snap!
I backpedaled and stalled. I got his address and, promising to write, began a year-long correspondence on this issue. First, I had to resolve the questions, should I say “doubts,” that he planted. Then, as I discovered the paucity of reason and truth in his arguments, and pointed them out, he rolled out one after another.
How would you have fared there? Want some help? Well, you know that we are going to do that. Why else would we have come this far?
Point one: I went to Dr. Dunn, our Pastor in Peoria and showed him the Greek conundrum. I did not have a Greek New Testament, and still do not, but rightly surmised that he did and he gladly pulled it out. “See, right there, two words for “God” are there.” Theos and theon. Dr. Dunn burst out in a chortle that was half amusement, half consternation, and half ridicule. (Yes, I know that doesn’t add up. Neither does the argument.)
“That is what happens when you try to read a language that you do not know,” he answered. “You know that there are cases in English for pronouns. ‘He’ and ‘him’ are the same word, the same person, but different cases, subjective and objective. Greek has cases for nouns. Theos is the subjective case, Theon is objective. They mean the same Person, God.”
So the New World “Translation” is a bad translation. In fact, a little research revealed that the crew that “translated” it had one guy who had taken one semester of college Greek and the rest were, at best, self-taught. Essentially, it was a copy of an English edition with the references to Jesus’ deity excised or revised. We will come back to this a little later.
Point two: I do not remember if I asked Dr. Dunn about the Council of Nicea, but a very simple bit of research (an interesting project back then, before Al Gore had invented the internet, but I digress) research revealed that this particular Council was called for the explicit purpose of CONDEMNING the heresy that Jesus was not God. It did affirm that He was God, but only because the body of Biblical truth and writing from M, M, L, and J on had declared it. The majority of the church accepted that doctrine and a small, but influential offshoot, had caused the controversy.
So my friend, Lincoln was his name, had totally reversed the purpose and declaration of the Nicean Council and bamboozled me. I should have stopped writing to him with that letter. As it turned out, every rebuttal I sent him was met with a new claim of Biblical error on the part of deists. This continued for a whole year or more. Finally, his response was to raise the Council of Nicea–again.
About that time, I noticed an article on cults in Moody Monthly. It listed several different cults and their leaders, and one, under the basic aegis of Jehovah’s Witnesses, but a deviation, was some named group, originated and led by a certain Lincoln. Now I knew why he was unconvinced by my arguments. This was his baby.
David Jeremiah was talking about doubt the other day and used some terms that apply here. There are “honest doubters” who are asking questions and are amenable to proof. Then there are dishonest doubters who have a set position and are merely arguing with no intention of learning the truth, or changing their position.
Dr. Jeremiah gave an example of a man who was convinced that he was dead. His psychiatrist tried to help him back to reality. “Do dead men bleed?”
“No,” was the answer. Then he was instructed to walk around for a week repeating that, “Dead men do not bleed.” When he came back a week later the doctor asked him again.
“Do dead men bleed?”
“No,” was the response. Then the doctor took a pin and pricked the finger of his patient. A drop of blood pooled on his finger. “Well, what do you know! Dead men do bleed!”
Dishonest doubt cannot be persuaded. I should have saved my postage. Fortunately, it was much less than it is now, so I guess we can chalk it up to being a witness, being ready to answer.
And, just for reference, a few verses that show the deity of Jesus are found in Revelation (21:6; 22:13) where He is called the first and the last, the beginning and the end, the alpha and the omega. Isaiah 41:4 and 44:6 repeat that. The Old Testament “Jehovah” or better, Yahweh is the same as the New Testament Jesus.
And the New World “T” did not find all of the references to Jesus being God. I had a guy who came back to my porch several times and I asked him if he had a Bible. Of course, he did and trotted out his NWT. We turned to Hebrews 1, and even in that poor translation, I found what I wanted. (I will quote NASB, but it is in their version–at least until someone finds it and removes it.) I began with verse 6
And when He again brings the firstborn into the world, He says, “And let all the angels of God worship Him.”
The “He” is God the Father. And He commanded the angels to “worship” the Son. But the OT specifically says that there is only One God, check the Isaiah references, and the commandments forbid worshiping any other god. So if NWT is right in John 1, then the Father, Jehovah, just contravened His own word. But I didn’t stop there.
Slide your finger down to verse 8: (“He” is again God, the Father)
But of the Son He says, “Your throne, O God, is forever and ever,
God the Father called the Son, “O God!” And, I have to sadly report that the visitor was a dishonest doubter. He denied that it meant what it said. He refused. He could not provide a different meaning, and he left. He has not returned.
A couple more quick notes. I will not comment on these, except to confirm that LORD in the Old Testament is Yahweh, or Jehovah. You can figure them out.
Isaiah 40:3 The voice of him that crieth in the wilderness, Prepare ye the way of the Lord, make straight in the desert a highway for our God.
Malachi 3:1 Behold, I will send my messenger, and he shall prepare the way before me: and the Lord, whom ye seek, shall suddenly come to his temple, even the messenger of the covenant, whom ye delight in: behold, he shall come, saith the Lord of hosts.
Matthew 3:3 For this is he that was spoken of by the prophet Isaiah, saying, The voice of one crying in the wilderness, Prepare ye the way of the Lord, make his paths straight.
Mark 1:3 The voice of one crying in the wilderness, Prepare ye the way of the Lord, make his paths straight.
Luke 1:76 And thou, child, shalt be called the prophet of the Highest: for thou shalt go before the face of the Lord to prepare his ways; (John the Baptist)
Luke 3:4 As it is written in the book of the words of Isaiah the prophet, saying, The voice of one crying in the wilderness, Prepare ye the way of the Lord, make his paths straight.
And for my last magic trick turn to Luke 19:44. Some translations render this as “time of your visitation.” Others, like CSB say:
They will crush you and your children among you to the ground, and they will not leave one stone on another in your midst, because you did not recognize the time when God visited you.”
Who visited them? Zechariah 9:9 spells it out, as:
Rejoice greatly, Daughter Zion! Shout in triumph, Daughter Jerusalem! Look, your King is coming to you; he is righteous and victorious, humble and riding on a donkey, on a colt, the foal of a donkey.
Jesus was the One Who visited them. This is confirmed in all four Gospels. (Matthew 21, Mark 11, Luke 19, John 12) God, in the flesh, appeared and presented Himself as God, King, and Messiah. They refused, and rejected Him. But that is for another day. Pardon the pun.
For our purpose today, Jesus was and is God. His deity was accepted and taught by His disciples, their followers, and true believers ever since. My friend Lincoln notwithstanding, that question is not a viable debate topic.
Vince would be pleased that we know what a “football” is.
Jesus is Lord: The LORD. Amen.
Saturday, March 28, 2020
Joseph’s Guidance for Coronovirus
Did you know that our friend Joseph has given us the perfect response to the pandemic that COVID-19 has unleashed? No, we do not leave out the “dem” of the description and behave in a panic. Check Genesis 50:20, 21.
As for you, you meant evil against me, but God meant it for good in order to bring about this present result, to preserve many people alive. 21 So therefore, do not be afraid; I will provide for you and your little ones.”
This verse is worth an entire sermon in and of itself. First, look at verse 21. “Do not be afraid,” or “Fear not.” As we face this crisis, we need neither to be afraid nor to let recriminations mark our attitude and response. I am studying the Tabernacle, and if you would like to check it out, go to my Facebook page to find articles on Jesus in the Tabernacle. The point is, that in the picture of the Tabernacle, an unclean priest dared not enter either the Holy Place or the Holy of Holies.
In contrast, a sinner, who has accepted the sacrifice of Jesus for our sins, now is not only allowed to enter this place, but is invited to do so. And that is a glorious prospect. When we pass through the curtain into God’s literal presence, we may do so with confidence and boldness as Hebrews 10:19, 20 proclaims.
Therefore, brethren, since we have confidence to enter the holy place by the blood of Jesus, 20 by a new and living way which He inaugurated for us through the veil, that is, His flesh,
So, even with a looming plague, we have no fear. We can confidently face whatever happens, because God is in control. And that brings us to Joseph.
Quick background, Joseph was hated by his brothers and eventually he was sold as a slave to be taken to Egypt. Now, tune into his comments. “As for you, you meant evil against me....”
Back then, his brothers had intended to “get rid” of this troublesome, tattletale, and irritating younger brother. And, to their way of thinking, their escapade was a resounding success. For over 13 years they heard nothing from him. They had “gotten away” with it, they thought. He was gone.
And the next two words are some of the most astounding and amazing words in the whole Bible. And I love this, “But God....” If you want to get blessed, take a concordance (or online Bible for our current electronically proficient friends) and look up how many times the Bible intones, “But God." (NASB has 44.) Sometimes it was negative. David, our friend, had taken his neighbor’s wife. (Check Command 10) And he had thought that he “gotten away with it.” But God was displeased.
(2 Samuel 11:27)
This was not literally a “But God,” but the idea is there. (That will increase the number of “buts,” but I digress. That led to David’s discipline from the Lord.
This “But God,” is a fantastic revelation. Look at it again. “...but God meant it for good.” What looked like a disaster, (sound familiar?) instead resulted in the salvation and preservation of Jacob’s family, the nation of Israel. Good came out of what at first seemed to be evil. Joseph, and the boys, had to wait 13 years to see the culmination of that. For the record, Joseph seems to have figured it out much sooner, but he did not see the actual culmination for 13 years. And the other guys did not see the “good,” although they evidently suffered from guilty consciences for the 13 years.
And, in the current situation, we are already seeing a lot of “good” that the Lord is bringing through this plague. Many people are hearing about the Lord and turning to Him. And, if the final result is that we are ushered through the curtain into God’s presence, “That will be glory!”
I have determined to no longer say that someone has “passed away.” They didn’t go anywhere. They went into the Presence. I am going to say that they “passed through.” And if there is a question as to what that means, I will have a wonderful opportunity to share about how we can go into God’s presence. And they can too. That will be glory.
And, if like ancient Ninevah, our country hears God’s voice in the message proclaimed by Jonah Corono, we will all turn back to God. And, like Ninevah was spared judgment for over 150 years, we may be preserved. (We know that Jonah prophesied between 793 and 752 BC, during the time of King Jereboam II. Ninevah was destroyed in approximately 612 BC.)
I will not document the sins and atrocities of Ninevah. Needless to say, they were an exceedingly wicked and debauched city and nation. Some of the current events and attitudes that we see in our own country rival those of ancient Ninevah. But God.... (Don’t you just love that statement?” But God is working in this current, world-wide plague. Millions of people were saved during the Spanish flu in 1919. That was history for us. Now we live in the China flu epidemic of 2020.
And we have already begun to hear of many people turning to the Lord. Wouldn’t it be wonderful to see a tsunami of belief come roaring out of this “storm?” (Two complementary metaphors.) We can confidently affirm with Joseph, “It was meant for evil, but God meant it for good.” Sounds a little like Romans 8:28.
And we know that God causes all things to work together for good to those who love God, to those who are called according to His purpose.
Look up. See what He is going to do. Once, in the midst of a very trying time, my Mom wrote me, and on the envelope, she had written, “Look up.” What a blessing. Thanks Mom. Look up.
As for you, you meant evil against me, but God meant it for good in order to bring about this present result, to preserve many people alive. 21 So therefore, do not be afraid; I will provide for you and your little ones.”
This verse is worth an entire sermon in and of itself. First, look at verse 21. “Do not be afraid,” or “Fear not.” As we face this crisis, we need neither to be afraid nor to let recriminations mark our attitude and response. I am studying the Tabernacle, and if you would like to check it out, go to my Facebook page to find articles on Jesus in the Tabernacle. The point is, that in the picture of the Tabernacle, an unclean priest dared not enter either the Holy Place or the Holy of Holies.
In contrast, a sinner, who has accepted the sacrifice of Jesus for our sins, now is not only allowed to enter this place, but is invited to do so. And that is a glorious prospect. When we pass through the curtain into God’s literal presence, we may do so with confidence and boldness as Hebrews 10:19, 20 proclaims.
Therefore, brethren, since we have confidence to enter the holy place by the blood of Jesus, 20 by a new and living way which He inaugurated for us through the veil, that is, His flesh,
So, even with a looming plague, we have no fear. We can confidently face whatever happens, because God is in control. And that brings us to Joseph.
Quick background, Joseph was hated by his brothers and eventually he was sold as a slave to be taken to Egypt. Now, tune into his comments. “As for you, you meant evil against me....”
Back then, his brothers had intended to “get rid” of this troublesome, tattletale, and irritating younger brother. And, to their way of thinking, their escapade was a resounding success. For over 13 years they heard nothing from him. They had “gotten away” with it, they thought. He was gone.
And the next two words are some of the most astounding and amazing words in the whole Bible. And I love this, “But God....” If you want to get blessed, take a concordance (or online Bible for our current electronically proficient friends) and look up how many times the Bible intones, “But God." (NASB has 44.) Sometimes it was negative. David, our friend, had taken his neighbor’s wife. (Check Command 10) And he had thought that he “gotten away with it.” But God was displeased.
(2 Samuel 11:27)
This was not literally a “But God,” but the idea is there. (That will increase the number of “buts,” but I digress. That led to David’s discipline from the Lord.
This “But God,” is a fantastic revelation. Look at it again. “...but God meant it for good.” What looked like a disaster, (sound familiar?) instead resulted in the salvation and preservation of Jacob’s family, the nation of Israel. Good came out of what at first seemed to be evil. Joseph, and the boys, had to wait 13 years to see the culmination of that. For the record, Joseph seems to have figured it out much sooner, but he did not see the actual culmination for 13 years. And the other guys did not see the “good,” although they evidently suffered from guilty consciences for the 13 years.
And, in the current situation, we are already seeing a lot of “good” that the Lord is bringing through this plague. Many people are hearing about the Lord and turning to Him. And, if the final result is that we are ushered through the curtain into God’s presence, “That will be glory!”
I have determined to no longer say that someone has “passed away.” They didn’t go anywhere. They went into the Presence. I am going to say that they “passed through.” And if there is a question as to what that means, I will have a wonderful opportunity to share about how we can go into God’s presence. And they can too. That will be glory.
And, if like ancient Ninevah, our country hears God’s voice in the message proclaimed by Jonah Corono, we will all turn back to God. And, like Ninevah was spared judgment for over 150 years, we may be preserved. (We know that Jonah prophesied between 793 and 752 BC, during the time of King Jereboam II. Ninevah was destroyed in approximately 612 BC.)
I will not document the sins and atrocities of Ninevah. Needless to say, they were an exceedingly wicked and debauched city and nation. Some of the current events and attitudes that we see in our own country rival those of ancient Ninevah. But God.... (Don’t you just love that statement?” But God is working in this current, world-wide plague. Millions of people were saved during the Spanish flu in 1919. That was history for us. Now we live in the China flu epidemic of 2020.
And we have already begun to hear of many people turning to the Lord. Wouldn’t it be wonderful to see a tsunami of belief come roaring out of this “storm?” (Two complementary metaphors.) We can confidently affirm with Joseph, “It was meant for evil, but God meant it for good.” Sounds a little like Romans 8:28.
And we know that God causes all things to work together for good to those who love God, to those who are called according to His purpose.
Look up. See what He is going to do. Once, in the midst of a very trying time, my Mom wrote me, and on the envelope, she had written, “Look up.” What a blessing. Thanks Mom. Look up.
Tuesday, March 24, 2020
Little Answers to Prayer Or Little Foxes
Song of Solomon 2:15 has a curious little phrase that has always mystified and captivated me.
“Catch the foxes for us, The little foxes that are ruining the vineyards, While our vineyards are in blossom.”
This is Solomon’s bride responding to him. (chapter 1) That chapter is a dialog between the two of them possibly near, or on their “honeymoon.” (If they had such things then.) For those who are not deeply emotional, this is almost embarrassing. But I digress. Interestingly, her identity is never established. She is another “unnamed hero” of the Old Testament. And of the New.
Solomon’s bride asks that the “little foxes” be caught. They are spoiling the vines. Little foxes are cute little guys, but they like to run in between the rows of a vineyard and even make their burrows under the vines, damaging the root system. Grapes, in larger amounts, can be toxic to foxes, but they may eat a few. It is more likely that the threat to the roots of the plants is what concerned the Bride.
“Little foxes” are just cute little problems that are often overlooked or tolerated. (And, sometimes we cuddle them.) “They are so cute!” But these foibles often accumulate or coalesce into gigantic challenges. That is off the topic, in a way, but in another, it is leading us to it. As little problems often mature into major conflicts and even disasters, so little successes lead to greater accomplishments and victories.
Rabbit trail: I was talking to a hall of fame college basketball coach and he was sharing with me some of his basic teachings. Hang on to your proverbial hats. I was blown over by his comments. He instructed his team on how to live outside of basketball. He said that if your life is in order, then your “game” will be in order. (A couple of meanings, there.)
Here is the “hat holder.” He said that the first thing he asked his players in the morning, was, did you make your bed and did you have a good bowel movement. (He may have been a little more graphic, but this is a family publication.) He went on to explain that these two things, and a good breakfast form the foundation of a strong approach to whatever the day may bring. And, by the way, a winning basketball team. “Little foxes.” That wasn’t so far off the track was it?
And “little foxes” can bring good or ill. In a vineyard, they are bad. But if they are out in a field, they can catch rodents and help preserve a crop. Now to our main point.
A common question is “Should we pray for little selfish desires and needs?” And, the answer is, “Of course.” God cares about the number of hairs on your head. He cares for sparrows. (Just for reflection, He also directs roughly six hundred sextillion, or so, stars in their courses. (Six with twenty-three zeros behind it, for the math-challenged. It is a BIG number.)
My wife works in an urgent care clinic. We have had several conversations about whether she should continue to work in light of the China coronavirus. To quit out of fear was not my advice. But friends, and our kids, counseled us, and particularly her to limit exposure opportunities.
I had quoted 2 Timothy 1:7:
For God has not given us a spirit of timidity...
We can trust the Lord to care for us, and the clinic was short-staffed anyway. She was serving the Lord, her employer, and more importantly, the sick people who came for help.
After a “conference video” with the kids, they quoted that verse back to us, read, me. They quoted the entire verse.
For God has not given us a spirit of timidity, but of power and love and discipline.
Don’t you just love it when the kids quote Scripture back to you? Thank You, Lord! “Don’t be afraid,” is stated over 360 times in the Bible. It kind of seems that the Lord is not interested in the emotion of fear being our driving force. Paul called it a spirit of timidity. (KJV translated it “fear.”)
But the kids pressed on. “...but of power and love and discipline.” Again KJV says “a sound mind.” And, the kids expanded, a sound mind, using our common sense, is part of the not being afraid. It is great when they “preach” to me.
Certain classes of the population are cautioned to avoid exposure. “The elderly...” That ain’t me, sputter, sputter. I, uh, well.., maybe. “...those with compromised immune systems or underlying health complications....” I am healthy as a horse. (And sometimes she might think that I smell like one after extreme exertion, like mowing the lawn. But I digress.)
“So, maybe a little older, but of robust, to me anyway, health,” was my analysis. So we prayed for wisdom. On Sunday night we prayed specifically for the Lord to direct us as to how to proceed with the competing priorities, precautions, and motivations in mind.
On Monday morning she called her supervisor to discuss the conundrum. And the supervisor informed my wife that all of the clinics in the chain were being inundated with calls from the public for guidance. In response, the company was going to set up a “call center” of sorts, a health hotline. It would answer the calls and screen them for the correct course of action. This would preserve limited personnel and material resources in the clinics; prevent, to some degree, cross-contamination between those with pressing needs in the clinics, and those who were merely seeking assurance or guidance; and direct everyone in the proper course of action.
If someone has been exposed to the virus, all that they can do is stay home and nurse it through. Unless patients become more seriously ill requiring hospitalization, the best diagnosis is to rest and recuperate. There is no treatment, no magic bullet, and no prevention. All anyone can do, including highly specialized medical facilities, is make the patient comfortable and wait for the immune system to kick into action and literally kick out the virus. (What a miraculous body we have. Can it possibly have developed accidentally? Negative.)
The supervisor told Bev that she would operate a call center in either a closed clinic or a separate room in an operating one. Several clinics will have to close due to staffing deficiencies. So, her continued presence would free some employee who was “less endangered or susceptible” to provide care instead of answering the phone. Side note: On one of her last shifts, over 100 calls were fielded to answer the question, “What should I do?”
Bev will start on her next shift to be trained and man (or is it woman) the phones. Let’s say, “Answer the phones,” and dispense advice.
Little answers to prayer. A “selfish” prayer, if you will. But, remember “counted hairs,” and “accounted for” sparrows. God is not limited to the capabilities of some supercomputer. He can keep up with all of our needs, and those of the entire world. A friend of mine told me that the U of Tennessee has, or is building, the largest, most powerful computer in the world. (Oak Ridge) It is larger than two basketball courts. (Compare that to the computer on your lap.)
El Capitan will clock in at 2 exaflops, quintillion calculations per second, that one was pretty fast. (Math: two with eighteen zeros, we are catching up to God, not) But that bad boy is no match for the 2.5 to 3-pound marvel that sits on your shoulders, between your ears. The human brain can outperform any mechanical device in existence. After all, a brain built it. And, that mobile computer is coupled with an immune system that can overcome all types of infectious invaders. And that is only two of maybe a thousand activities that it can conduct–simultaneously! We are blessed with a perfect repository for our soul. (Not random or accidental.) Thank You, Jesus!
So the Lord answered a selfish prayer, but still left us the option of operating out of an absence of fear, and in power and love and discipline. Praise and thank You, Lord. Amen.
Little foxes add up.
“Catch the foxes for us, The little foxes that are ruining the vineyards, While our vineyards are in blossom.”
This is Solomon’s bride responding to him. (chapter 1) That chapter is a dialog between the two of them possibly near, or on their “honeymoon.” (If they had such things then.) For those who are not deeply emotional, this is almost embarrassing. But I digress. Interestingly, her identity is never established. She is another “unnamed hero” of the Old Testament. And of the New.
Solomon’s bride asks that the “little foxes” be caught. They are spoiling the vines. Little foxes are cute little guys, but they like to run in between the rows of a vineyard and even make their burrows under the vines, damaging the root system. Grapes, in larger amounts, can be toxic to foxes, but they may eat a few. It is more likely that the threat to the roots of the plants is what concerned the Bride.
“Little foxes” are just cute little problems that are often overlooked or tolerated. (And, sometimes we cuddle them.) “They are so cute!” But these foibles often accumulate or coalesce into gigantic challenges. That is off the topic, in a way, but in another, it is leading us to it. As little problems often mature into major conflicts and even disasters, so little successes lead to greater accomplishments and victories.
Rabbit trail: I was talking to a hall of fame college basketball coach and he was sharing with me some of his basic teachings. Hang on to your proverbial hats. I was blown over by his comments. He instructed his team on how to live outside of basketball. He said that if your life is in order, then your “game” will be in order. (A couple of meanings, there.)
Here is the “hat holder.” He said that the first thing he asked his players in the morning, was, did you make your bed and did you have a good bowel movement. (He may have been a little more graphic, but this is a family publication.) He went on to explain that these two things, and a good breakfast form the foundation of a strong approach to whatever the day may bring. And, by the way, a winning basketball team. “Little foxes.” That wasn’t so far off the track was it?
And “little foxes” can bring good or ill. In a vineyard, they are bad. But if they are out in a field, they can catch rodents and help preserve a crop. Now to our main point.
A common question is “Should we pray for little selfish desires and needs?” And, the answer is, “Of course.” God cares about the number of hairs on your head. He cares for sparrows. (Just for reflection, He also directs roughly six hundred sextillion, or so, stars in their courses. (Six with twenty-three zeros behind it, for the math-challenged. It is a BIG number.)
My wife works in an urgent care clinic. We have had several conversations about whether she should continue to work in light of the China coronavirus. To quit out of fear was not my advice. But friends, and our kids, counseled us, and particularly her to limit exposure opportunities.
I had quoted 2 Timothy 1:7:
For God has not given us a spirit of timidity...
We can trust the Lord to care for us, and the clinic was short-staffed anyway. She was serving the Lord, her employer, and more importantly, the sick people who came for help.
After a “conference video” with the kids, they quoted that verse back to us, read, me. They quoted the entire verse.
For God has not given us a spirit of timidity, but of power and love and discipline.
Don’t you just love it when the kids quote Scripture back to you? Thank You, Lord! “Don’t be afraid,” is stated over 360 times in the Bible. It kind of seems that the Lord is not interested in the emotion of fear being our driving force. Paul called it a spirit of timidity. (KJV translated it “fear.”)
But the kids pressed on. “...but of power and love and discipline.” Again KJV says “a sound mind.” And, the kids expanded, a sound mind, using our common sense, is part of the not being afraid. It is great when they “preach” to me.
Certain classes of the population are cautioned to avoid exposure. “The elderly...” That ain’t me, sputter, sputter. I, uh, well.., maybe. “...those with compromised immune systems or underlying health complications....” I am healthy as a horse. (And sometimes she might think that I smell like one after extreme exertion, like mowing the lawn. But I digress.)
“So, maybe a little older, but of robust, to me anyway, health,” was my analysis. So we prayed for wisdom. On Sunday night we prayed specifically for the Lord to direct us as to how to proceed with the competing priorities, precautions, and motivations in mind.
On Monday morning she called her supervisor to discuss the conundrum. And the supervisor informed my wife that all of the clinics in the chain were being inundated with calls from the public for guidance. In response, the company was going to set up a “call center” of sorts, a health hotline. It would answer the calls and screen them for the correct course of action. This would preserve limited personnel and material resources in the clinics; prevent, to some degree, cross-contamination between those with pressing needs in the clinics, and those who were merely seeking assurance or guidance; and direct everyone in the proper course of action.
If someone has been exposed to the virus, all that they can do is stay home and nurse it through. Unless patients become more seriously ill requiring hospitalization, the best diagnosis is to rest and recuperate. There is no treatment, no magic bullet, and no prevention. All anyone can do, including highly specialized medical facilities, is make the patient comfortable and wait for the immune system to kick into action and literally kick out the virus. (What a miraculous body we have. Can it possibly have developed accidentally? Negative.)
The supervisor told Bev that she would operate a call center in either a closed clinic or a separate room in an operating one. Several clinics will have to close due to staffing deficiencies. So, her continued presence would free some employee who was “less endangered or susceptible” to provide care instead of answering the phone. Side note: On one of her last shifts, over 100 calls were fielded to answer the question, “What should I do?”
Bev will start on her next shift to be trained and man (or is it woman) the phones. Let’s say, “Answer the phones,” and dispense advice.
Little answers to prayer. A “selfish” prayer, if you will. But, remember “counted hairs,” and “accounted for” sparrows. God is not limited to the capabilities of some supercomputer. He can keep up with all of our needs, and those of the entire world. A friend of mine told me that the U of Tennessee has, or is building, the largest, most powerful computer in the world. (Oak Ridge) It is larger than two basketball courts. (Compare that to the computer on your lap.)
El Capitan will clock in at 2 exaflops, quintillion calculations per second, that one was pretty fast. (Math: two with eighteen zeros, we are catching up to God, not) But that bad boy is no match for the 2.5 to 3-pound marvel that sits on your shoulders, between your ears. The human brain can outperform any mechanical device in existence. After all, a brain built it. And, that mobile computer is coupled with an immune system that can overcome all types of infectious invaders. And that is only two of maybe a thousand activities that it can conduct–simultaneously! We are blessed with a perfect repository for our soul. (Not random or accidental.) Thank You, Jesus!
So the Lord answered a selfish prayer, but still left us the option of operating out of an absence of fear, and in power and love and discipline. Praise and thank You, Lord. Amen.
Little foxes add up.
Saturday, March 21, 2020
John the B The Greatest Prophet
There are times when people suggest that a study of prophecy is a waste of time. “We should just focus on the Gospels to win souls,” is their explanation. Ironically, the Gospels have a significant amount of prophecy imbedded within the story of Jesus and His disciples. Even as He was being presented at the Temple, we find prophecy being pronounced or repeated. Luke 2:25
And there was a man in Jerusalem whose name was Simeon; and this man was righteous and devout, looking for the consolation of Israel; and the Holy Spirit was upon him. 26 And it had been revealed to him by the Holy Spirit that he would not see death before he had seen the Lord’s Christ. 27 And he came in the Spirit into the temple; and when the parents brought in the child Jesus, to carry out for Him the custom of the Law, 28 then he took Him into his arms, and blessed God, and said, 29 “Now Lord, You are releasing Your bond-servant to depart in peace, According to Your word; 30 For my eyes have seen Your salvation, 31 Which You have prepared in the presence of all peoples, 32 A Light of revelation to the Gentiles, And the glory of Your people Israel.”
33 And His father and mother were amazed at the things which were being said about Him. 34 And Simeon blessed them and said to Mary His mother, “Behold, this Child is appointed for the fall and rise of many in Israel, and for a sign to be opposed— 35 and a sword will pierce even your own soul—to the end that thoughts from many hearts may be revealed.”
36 And there was a prophetess, Anna the daughter of Phanuel, of the tribe of Asher. She was advanced in years and had lived with her husband seven years after her marriage, 37 and then as a widow to the age of eighty-four. She never left the temple, serving night and day with fastings and prayers. 38 At that very moment she came up and began giving thanks to God, and continued to speak of Him to all those who were looking for the redemption of Jerusalem.
These two elderly saints made some astounding prophecies. Simeon, first recognized that Jesus was indeed the Promised One, the Messiah. That was backward looking. Then he talked about a light to the Gentiles. Nowhere in Jesus’ earthly ministry did He preach to the Gentiles. But His followers did, from Pentecost (Acts 2) on. But, even more, Simeon mentioned the “glory of Your people, Israel.” That has not happened yet. Simeon was looking to the Millennium.
But that is not all. His final declaration is a summation of the hopes of Israel and the world. (34, 35)
“Behold, this Child is appointed for the fall and rise of many in Israel, and for a sign to be opposed— 35 and a sword will pierce even your own soul—to the end that thoughts from many hearts may be revealed.”
“The fall and rise of many...” must have been referring to the destruction of Jerusalem in AD 70. Notice the order of the statement. And the rise would be the installation of Israel as His people in the 1000 year reign of Christ. Nothing else in the story fits those two items. But the final coup de grace for Simeon as in v. 35. The “sword” piercing Mary’s own soul/heart clearly refers to a specific detail of the crucifixion. He was not a bad prophet. But wait. Anna, an elderly widow has something to say. Verse 38
At that very moment she came up and began giving thanks to God, and continued to speak of Him to all those who were looking for the redemption of Jerusalem.
The “redemption of Jerusalem” is a ways into the future. In fact, we have not yet witnessed that. It will be the seat of Government under the Messiah. We may see an early preview of that right now, but then, it will be the place of the Throne from which the entire world will be governed. I love prophecy.
Now, turn to the one who Jesus described as the greatest prophet. Matthew 11:11 and Luke 7:28 identify him.
I say to you, among those born of women there is no one greater than John; yet he who is least in the kingdom of God is greater than he.”
We will not exegete this verse. It is just to lead into his prophecy. Luke 3:16
John answered and said to them all, “As for me, I baptize you with water; but One is coming who is mightier than I, and I am not fit to untie the thong of His sandals; He will baptize you with the Holy Spirit and fire.
That is clearly referring to Acts 2 when the Holy Spirit was poured out (baptized) the church. Just before this, John made some other astounding prophecies. V. 5, 6
“Every ravine will be filled, And every mountain and hill will be brought low; The crooked will become straight, And the rough roads smooth; 6 And all flesh will see the salvation of God.”
He was quoting Isaiah 57:14; 49:11; 45:2; 42:16; 52:10; and Psalm 98:2, 3. That has not happened yet, but I cannot wait until it is. Glory.
And back to v. 17 in Luke 3.
“His winnowing fork is in His hand to thoroughly clear His threshing floor, and to gather the wheat into His barn; but He will burn up the chaff with unquenchable fire.”
Now we are really getting ready for a glorious day. I will not speculate as to whether this is the rapture (1 Thessalonians 4), the Glorious coming (Revelation 19), or the final judgment in Revelation 20. Maybe it is all of them.
But John’s piece de resistance in prophecy is found in John 1. Before we look at that, look at verse 21.
They asked him, “What then? Are you Elijah?” And he said, “I am not.” “Are you the Prophet?” And he answered, “No.”
This verse has always puzzled me. It seems like they asked the same thing twice. When they asked about John being Elijah then repeated it as the Prophet, I thought they meant the reference in Malachi 4:5.
“Behold, I am going to send you Elijah the prophet before the coming of the great and terrible day of the Lord.”
I thought that this verse was what they were asking, only they did it twice. But I was wrong. The Prophet was the One the Israelites had been expecting since Moses promised. We have to turn back to Deuteronomy 18:18. This is the Lord informing Moses of His plans.
I will raise up a prophet from among their countrymen like you, and I will put My words in his mouth, and he shall speak to them all that I command him.
Now that mention of John being the “one going before”makes sense. Luke 3:4
...as it is written in the book of the words of Isaiah the prophet, “The voice of one crying in the wilderness, ‘Make ready the way of the Lord, Make His paths straight.
Does that give you goose bumps? This is telling the audience, and us, that Jesus is not only the God of the Old Testament, He is also the Messiah. Sadly, it seems that no one, or at least very few understood that. My admiration for John has just gone up several notches.
But his father, Zecharias not bad is not too bad of a prophet, himself. Luke 1:67-79
And his father Zacharias was filled with the Holy Spirit, and prophesied, saying: 68 “Blessed be the Lord God of Israel, For He has visited us and accomplished redemption for His people, 69 And has raised up a horn of salvation for us In the house of David His servant—70 As He spoke by the mouth of His holy prophets from of old—Salvation from our enemies, And from the hand of all who hate us; 72 To show mercy toward our fathers, And to remember His holy covenant, 73 The oath which He swore to Abraham our father, 74 To grant us that we, being rescued from the hand of our enemies, Might serve Him without fear, 75 In holiness and righteousness before Him all our days. 76 “And you, child, will be called the prophet of the Most High; For you will go on before the Lord to prepare His ways; 77 To give to His people the knowledge of salvation By the forgiveness of their sins, 78 Because of the tender mercy of our God, With which the Sunrise from on high will visit us, 79 To shine upon those who sit in darkness and the shadow of death, To guide our feet into the way of peace.”
Amen. The Messiah is coming, and, you will be not “the Prophet” of Deuteronomy, but the prophet of Malachi. Sadly, the Jews did not accept his testimony as the arguments in the book of John illustrates. But for those who did, and those who still do, John’s prophesy is right on. Glory.
What were we talking about? Oh yes. Prophecy, and John the Baptist. Maybe we should call this John the B and his family. The point is that prophecy is the glue that ties the Old and New Testament together. From Genesis 3:15 to the picture of the New Jerusalem and heaven in Revelation, we follow a scarlet prophetic cord. The role of prophecy is to point us to the Savior. And even when it is about a more mundane object, we are still able to use that miscellaneous prediction and its fulfillment as verification and an assurance. Assurance that, just as this one was exactly and completely fulfilled, so shall the ones in the future about Jesus, His return, and His eternal reign on the earth be realized.
And back to our original question about “sticking to the Gospels,” we will not venture into Matthew 24, Mark 13, and Luke 21. But we have to go clear to Revelation to find a greater volume of prophetic Scripture than we saw earlier and in these three chapters. Jesus is coming again. The entire Bible is dedicated to that scenario. And to that, we respond...
Glory. Hallelujah. Amen. Even so, come Lord Jesus.
And there was a man in Jerusalem whose name was Simeon; and this man was righteous and devout, looking for the consolation of Israel; and the Holy Spirit was upon him. 26 And it had been revealed to him by the Holy Spirit that he would not see death before he had seen the Lord’s Christ. 27 And he came in the Spirit into the temple; and when the parents brought in the child Jesus, to carry out for Him the custom of the Law, 28 then he took Him into his arms, and blessed God, and said, 29 “Now Lord, You are releasing Your bond-servant to depart in peace, According to Your word; 30 For my eyes have seen Your salvation, 31 Which You have prepared in the presence of all peoples, 32 A Light of revelation to the Gentiles, And the glory of Your people Israel.”
33 And His father and mother were amazed at the things which were being said about Him. 34 And Simeon blessed them and said to Mary His mother, “Behold, this Child is appointed for the fall and rise of many in Israel, and for a sign to be opposed— 35 and a sword will pierce even your own soul—to the end that thoughts from many hearts may be revealed.”
36 And there was a prophetess, Anna the daughter of Phanuel, of the tribe of Asher. She was advanced in years and had lived with her husband seven years after her marriage, 37 and then as a widow to the age of eighty-four. She never left the temple, serving night and day with fastings and prayers. 38 At that very moment she came up and began giving thanks to God, and continued to speak of Him to all those who were looking for the redemption of Jerusalem.
These two elderly saints made some astounding prophecies. Simeon, first recognized that Jesus was indeed the Promised One, the Messiah. That was backward looking. Then he talked about a light to the Gentiles. Nowhere in Jesus’ earthly ministry did He preach to the Gentiles. But His followers did, from Pentecost (Acts 2) on. But, even more, Simeon mentioned the “glory of Your people, Israel.” That has not happened yet. Simeon was looking to the Millennium.
But that is not all. His final declaration is a summation of the hopes of Israel and the world. (34, 35)
“Behold, this Child is appointed for the fall and rise of many in Israel, and for a sign to be opposed— 35 and a sword will pierce even your own soul—to the end that thoughts from many hearts may be revealed.”
“The fall and rise of many...” must have been referring to the destruction of Jerusalem in AD 70. Notice the order of the statement. And the rise would be the installation of Israel as His people in the 1000 year reign of Christ. Nothing else in the story fits those two items. But the final coup de grace for Simeon as in v. 35. The “sword” piercing Mary’s own soul/heart clearly refers to a specific detail of the crucifixion. He was not a bad prophet. But wait. Anna, an elderly widow has something to say. Verse 38
At that very moment she came up and began giving thanks to God, and continued to speak of Him to all those who were looking for the redemption of Jerusalem.
The “redemption of Jerusalem” is a ways into the future. In fact, we have not yet witnessed that. It will be the seat of Government under the Messiah. We may see an early preview of that right now, but then, it will be the place of the Throne from which the entire world will be governed. I love prophecy.
Now, turn to the one who Jesus described as the greatest prophet. Matthew 11:11 and Luke 7:28 identify him.
I say to you, among those born of women there is no one greater than John; yet he who is least in the kingdom of God is greater than he.”
We will not exegete this verse. It is just to lead into his prophecy. Luke 3:16
John answered and said to them all, “As for me, I baptize you with water; but One is coming who is mightier than I, and I am not fit to untie the thong of His sandals; He will baptize you with the Holy Spirit and fire.
That is clearly referring to Acts 2 when the Holy Spirit was poured out (baptized) the church. Just before this, John made some other astounding prophecies. V. 5, 6
“Every ravine will be filled, And every mountain and hill will be brought low; The crooked will become straight, And the rough roads smooth; 6 And all flesh will see the salvation of God.”
He was quoting Isaiah 57:14; 49:11; 45:2; 42:16; 52:10; and Psalm 98:2, 3. That has not happened yet, but I cannot wait until it is. Glory.
And back to v. 17 in Luke 3.
“His winnowing fork is in His hand to thoroughly clear His threshing floor, and to gather the wheat into His barn; but He will burn up the chaff with unquenchable fire.”
Now we are really getting ready for a glorious day. I will not speculate as to whether this is the rapture (1 Thessalonians 4), the Glorious coming (Revelation 19), or the final judgment in Revelation 20. Maybe it is all of them.
But John’s piece de resistance in prophecy is found in John 1. Before we look at that, look at verse 21.
They asked him, “What then? Are you Elijah?” And he said, “I am not.” “Are you the Prophet?” And he answered, “No.”
This verse has always puzzled me. It seems like they asked the same thing twice. When they asked about John being Elijah then repeated it as the Prophet, I thought they meant the reference in Malachi 4:5.
“Behold, I am going to send you Elijah the prophet before the coming of the great and terrible day of the Lord.”
I thought that this verse was what they were asking, only they did it twice. But I was wrong. The Prophet was the One the Israelites had been expecting since Moses promised. We have to turn back to Deuteronomy 18:18. This is the Lord informing Moses of His plans.
I will raise up a prophet from among their countrymen like you, and I will put My words in his mouth, and he shall speak to them all that I command him.
Now that mention of John being the “one going before”makes sense. Luke 3:4
...as it is written in the book of the words of Isaiah the prophet, “The voice of one crying in the wilderness, ‘Make ready the way of the Lord, Make His paths straight.
Does that give you goose bumps? This is telling the audience, and us, that Jesus is not only the God of the Old Testament, He is also the Messiah. Sadly, it seems that no one, or at least very few understood that. My admiration for John has just gone up several notches.
But his father, Zecharias not bad is not too bad of a prophet, himself. Luke 1:67-79
And his father Zacharias was filled with the Holy Spirit, and prophesied, saying: 68 “Blessed be the Lord God of Israel, For He has visited us and accomplished redemption for His people, 69 And has raised up a horn of salvation for us In the house of David His servant—70 As He spoke by the mouth of His holy prophets from of old—Salvation from our enemies, And from the hand of all who hate us; 72 To show mercy toward our fathers, And to remember His holy covenant, 73 The oath which He swore to Abraham our father, 74 To grant us that we, being rescued from the hand of our enemies, Might serve Him without fear, 75 In holiness and righteousness before Him all our days. 76 “And you, child, will be called the prophet of the Most High; For you will go on before the Lord to prepare His ways; 77 To give to His people the knowledge of salvation By the forgiveness of their sins, 78 Because of the tender mercy of our God, With which the Sunrise from on high will visit us, 79 To shine upon those who sit in darkness and the shadow of death, To guide our feet into the way of peace.”
Amen. The Messiah is coming, and, you will be not “the Prophet” of Deuteronomy, but the prophet of Malachi. Sadly, the Jews did not accept his testimony as the arguments in the book of John illustrates. But for those who did, and those who still do, John’s prophesy is right on. Glory.
What were we talking about? Oh yes. Prophecy, and John the Baptist. Maybe we should call this John the B and his family. The point is that prophecy is the glue that ties the Old and New Testament together. From Genesis 3:15 to the picture of the New Jerusalem and heaven in Revelation, we follow a scarlet prophetic cord. The role of prophecy is to point us to the Savior. And even when it is about a more mundane object, we are still able to use that miscellaneous prediction and its fulfillment as verification and an assurance. Assurance that, just as this one was exactly and completely fulfilled, so shall the ones in the future about Jesus, His return, and His eternal reign on the earth be realized.
And back to our original question about “sticking to the Gospels,” we will not venture into Matthew 24, Mark 13, and Luke 21. But we have to go clear to Revelation to find a greater volume of prophetic Scripture than we saw earlier and in these three chapters. Jesus is coming again. The entire Bible is dedicated to that scenario. And to that, we respond...
Glory. Hallelujah. Amen. Even so, come Lord Jesus.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)